The Economics of Integration
In Charlotte where I am from, the
desire for economic gain by Charlotte’s white business class contributed to a
peaceful social revolution in the early 1960s.
The city was a divided place after World War II. Some reports have the city as being among the
most racially segregated cites in the nation (Griffin 82). “It was not a liberal city with a passion to
integrate; on the contrary, there was a simple civic pride that was
fundamentally…conservative in its concern for social order. But there were leaders who understood that
order was threatened by absence of progress, and they were determined to see
that Charlotte did not come apart” (Gaillard 23). Blacks began boycotting major businesses in
the city. As a developing city, creating
a stable industry was important. Black
activist Charles Jones said that “Charlotte, wanting to be the banking center
of the South, finally gave in to losing money.
The Committee on Community Relations decided to make things happen in
order to get the city back in the [black]” (Lessons). In that aspect they were very successful as
Charlotte now is considered by most the banking capital of the South. The same held true for hotels, department
stores, and restaurants. The social
order and profit were a higher priority than one’s racial presumptions.
I wonder if
the same was true in Memphis. Green
reports that one of the many grassroots movements in Memphis was the “Stay Away
from Downtown Days” campaign, in which “supporters would boycott downtown
stores and theatres on Mondays and Thursdays” (Green 235). The intent here seems to be to encourage
integration on economic grounds. If
these businesses entered the red on Mondays or Thursdays, they may have been
quick to desegregate. Green reports that
it only took one year of sit-ins and protesting before “downtown businesses
began to desegregate” (Green 237). In a city like Memphis it is hard to believe
that century’s worth of hostility and discrimination would abruptly shift
overnight. Thus, I think that many of
Memphis’ businesses made the decision to desegregate to both maintain a
peaceful social order and to ensure their own economic well-being. Do you think there were any other factors
outside of economic or moral considerations?
Gaillard,
Frye. The Dream Long Deferred: The Landmark Struggle for Desegregation in
Charlotte, North Carolina. 2
Ed. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.
Green,
Laurie B. Battling the Plantation
Mentality. Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
Griffin,
Willie J. An Indigenous Civil Rights
Movement: Charlotte, North Carolina,
1940-1963. Thesis Paper. Morgan State University. 1996
Lessons
from the Lunch Counter. Dir. Crump,
Steve. WTVI Charlotte, 2004.
One motivation that weighted heavily on the minds of white business owners was the fear of litigation. In the case Turner v. The City of Memphis, the United States Supreme ruled that the City of Memphis was in violation of the 14th amendment when they denied nonsegregated services to an African American who was trying to eat in a restaurant located inside the Memphis Airport. This case would certainly have made Memphis store owners aware of the potential legal ramifications that came with segregation.
ReplyDelete