I was sitting in the library with some
friends when I received a text from someone that said, “Y’all my little just
texted me and said someone told her a big black guy in a white hat has stolen
laptops in the library?? So keep an eye on each other’s stuff.” My point is not
whether or not this comment is offensive, but rather the implications that it
will have. This brief text message made me think about the bigger picture here
at Rhodes. I have multiple black friends at Rhodes who have told me about their
experiences with campus safety and other members of the Rhodes community
questioning whether or not they indeed go to Rhodes and are allowed to be on
campus. In one case my friend did not have his Lynx Card on him and the campus
safety officer insisted on looking up his R#.
I am sure that you have all heard the
phrase “white-girl wave” used around campus. The phrase implies that any
middle- to upper-class white female is able to get through campus safety simply
by smiling and waving as they drive through the gates whether have a parking
sticker on their car or not. I have found this to be true on multiple
occasions. In contrast, I also know black male students who have been stopped
driving onto campus in a car with a parking sticker. This range of experiences
on our college campus is unacceptable. What is it that makes “black” or “white”
the defining characteristic of a person? Although our college is not all white,
it makes me wonder how the campus security at a historically black college
would treat me if I were to drive on campus. Does this form of profiling work
both ways?
I was sitting in the library with some
friends when I received a text from someone that said, “Y’all my little just
texted me and said someone told her a big black guy in a white hat has stolen
laptops in the library?? So keep an eye on each other’s stuff.” My point is not
whether or not this comment is offensive, but rather the implications that it
will have. This brief text message made me think about the bigger picture here
at Rhodes. I have multiple black friends at Rhodes who have told me about their
experiences with campus safety and other members of the Rhodes community
questioning whether or not they indeed go to Rhodes and are allowed to be on
campus. In one case my friend did not have his Lynx Card on him and the campus
safety officer insisted on looking up his R#.
I am sure that you have all heard the
phrase “white-girl wave” used around campus. The phrase implies that any
middle- to upper-class white female is able to get through campus safety simply
by smiling and waving as they drive through the gates whether have a parking
sticker on their car or not. I have found this to be true on multiple
occasions. In contrast, I also know black male students who have been stopped
driving onto campus in a car with a parking sticker. This range of experiences
on our college campus is unacceptable. What is it that makes “black” or “white”
the defining characteristic of a person? Although our college is not all white,
it makes me wonder how the campus security at a historically black college
would treat me if I were to drive on campus. Does this form of profiling work
both ways?
When I say that I go to Rhodes, most
people’s first assumption is that I come from a wealthy background and have had
everything handed to be in life. However, when some of my friends who are not
white say they go to Rhodes, they are treated as if is a gift that they were
fortunate enough to attend such a prestigious school. I know plenty of people
of all races who are at Rhodes partially because their parents are extremely
wealthy and have been able to provide great opportunities for them because of
it. I also know plenty of people (of all races) who come from rough backgrounds
and have worked hard to face adversity and attend Rhodes.
When I say that I go to Rhodes, most
people’s first assumption is that I come from a wealthy background and have had
everything handed to be in life. However, when some of my friends who are not
white say they go to Rhodes, they are treated as if is a gift that they were
fortunate enough to attend such a prestigious school. I know plenty of people
of all races who are at Rhodes partially because their parents are extremely
wealthy and have been able to provide great opportunities for them because of
it. I also know plenty of people (of all races) who come from rough backgrounds
and have worked hard to face adversity and attend Rhodes.
Campus Safety certainly profiles individuals driving through the gates. I have an old car - a 1996 with a broken muffler and a squealing fan-belt. I certainly notice how the cars in front of me - generally models from the past 5 years - pass through the gates without Campus Safety looking twice. Then, when it is my turn to drive past they will sometimes stand up like they want to stop me. Then when they see my sticker - or my face I suppose - they wave me through. I believe that at Rhodes the message you received would or will lead to even more profiling, even by students, of Black students who they do not know, which is completely uncalled for.
ReplyDeleteThe discretion that Campus Safety uses has long been a hot topic. I am interested to know at what rate is it the white officers or black officers who often stop the black students or black visitors who come onto campus. It may not play a role in this at all, but it would be interesting to find out. However, one of the newer officers stopped me in the middle of the day when I was in my dad's truck without a sticker. He even asked to see my lynx card to ensure I was a student. While I half-expected him to stop us because the truck didn't have a sticker, I did not expect him to ask to see my Lynx card. I was happy that he didn't just assume I was a student and let me pass without stopping us. I cannot, however, imagine this happening on a daily basis and be subject to the suspicion of the officers just because of my skin color. I wonder if the officers have rules about what kind of discretion they should use when stopping people or on campus, or if they are just to use personal discretion. Either way, it should be reevaluated.
ReplyDelete