We
are all familiar with Memphis’ connection to music. One thing I found
particularly interesting about Professor Hughes’ lecture a few weeks ago is the
way Memphis had to fight to stake their claim in the industry especially when
other places like Muscle Shoals were attempting to copy the “Memphis sound.” Ironically, Memphis is facing a similar
issue today when it comes to the representation of black music.
A
museum dedicated to black music will not be located in Memphis, but instead in
Nashville. It is an interesting
choice if you reflect on our discussion during Professor Hughes’ lecture. Nashville was (and still is) seen home
to country music which is most often identified as white music. Memphis, however,
was home to the Memphis sound that was comprised of rock n’ roll, country, and
soul music. The latter of which was often associated as the black sound.
Because of the tension between the two styles of music, there was a tension
between the two cities. Therefore,
it is interesting that a museum dedicated to black music will find its home in
Nashville.
However,
the article about the museum quotes Al Bell, the chairman of the Memphis Music
Foundation and former owner of Stax Records. “So, this is white Nashville, Tennessee saying we want it
here in Nashville and that excites me,” Bell says. He makes an interesting point. By placing the museum in
Nashville, it could diversify the city and open it up to other histories of
music that it might not otherwise tell. Bell makes another comment about the practicalities
of Nashville getting the museum. “Bell said Nashville leaders stepped up,
raised private money and got it done. It is something he said Memphis struggles
to do.” Memphis loves to talk
about its history with music, but it could draw the enthusiasm or raise enough
funds to house a museum dedicated to the music it helped create. This also
resonates with something we talked about in class. Yes, Memphis has a history
with music, but what about its present (and future)? We love going on Beale and
hearing the local musicians, but it is not something that garners national
attention or a national following like it did in the past.
Even
though I’ve been a Memphian for only four years, I did feel slighted that
Memphis did not get the museum, but Bell’s comments made me re-evaluate those
feelings. By having the museum in Nashville, it could do something for race
relations in music on a larger scale.
However, it does deny Memphis the opportunity to tell its own story.
What do you think about the museum being located in Nashville? Should Memphis
have fought harder to raise the appropriate funds? Do you think music is still
an important part of Memphis and its culture?
http://wreg.com/2014/04/24/nashville-not-memphis-will-be-home-of-new-national-museum-of-african-american-music/
http://wreg.com/2014/04/24/nashville-not-memphis-will-be-home-of-new-national-museum-of-african-american-music/
Because I have a closer connection with Memphis than I do with Nashville, I obviously wish the museum was here. But I do understand where Al Bell is coming from. Memphis already has the Stax Museum, Sun Studio, and the Memphis Rock N' Soul Museum. The city is teaming with history and information about the music that was created here. I think having this museum located in Nashville is a way to spread more knowledge and make more connections. Now, more young people will have the opportunity to learn about the music that makes their state so cool. Music is still important to Memphis, but the part it plays in the city is always changing. Beale Street will always be a part of the city, and so will its musical history. But we can't forget all of the original artists who are finding their way in the city today and are changing the way Memphians view and appreciate music.
ReplyDelete